On Wednesday 02 March 2005 23:57, David Gerard wrote:
Marco Krohn wrote:
Also I doubt that the test was a blind test, at least the two tests I am aware of were to my knowledge not blind tests, but I can be wrong about this. Which test do you refer to?
I was originally referring to the c't test (I think it was). I thought it was a blind test: here are three articles, which is best?
I just looked it up again (c't 21/04) and there is nothing about a blind test. It would not be particular hard to make it a blind test, but at least they do not mention it explicitly.
BTW the average results (scale from 0 - 5, 5 being "excellent") were:
Wikipedia - 3.6 Brockhaus - 3.3 MS EncartaPro - 3.1
best regards, Marco