Gareth Owen wrote:
Or, indeed, beyond. Which is why you don't (or at least *shouldn't*) roll out new code into production use without stress testing it.
Good idea! Are you volunteering to do this for us next time around?
Can we not have the old one back until the code/hardware can at least perform in an acceptable manner?
Since people successfully editing and working, and since the data is now in a totally different format, rolling back is not really much of an option.
I agree that the site is slow. It will improve over the next few days.
PPS: There is also an old saying that starts: "If it ain't broke..."
There's also an old saying: "Beggars can't be choosers."
--Jimbo