On Wednesday 16 October 2002 12:01 pm Ruth Ifcher wrote:
Hi Members, ..... First, in regard to "redirect highlighting" proposed by Mr. Manske, I think that a regular Wikipedia reader will find this quite disconcerting. At most, I think it should be a logged-in user's choice.
I must have missed that one. Yeah, I agree, highlighting redirects is a bad idea. If there are valid alternate ways to title something then an alternate but still perfectly valid name shouldn't look different. At worst this would be very confusing, at best this is needless feature creep.
Second, in regard to the "first page" or "main page" contents, I thinkthe main page, as it is, is far too "busy" for the everyday user. They should be looking for a choice of language and a place to put a search argument. I think that is pretty much all that belongs there, in terms of content. This doesn't mean the page cannot be attractive.
For the main or 'gateway page' for the whole project I tend to agree -- but my view of what isn't too "busy" may differ from yours.
However the whole 'International Wikipedia gateway at www.wikipedia.org' thing has one very serious flaw as it is now; There is no direct and obvious link to Recent Changes.
In our rush for the URL switch, it would have been a mistake just to put up a static page at www.wikipedia.org that merely directed users to each language's Main Page. IMO what really is needed is a combined Recent Changes at www.wikipedia.org. That way somebody landing at www.wikipedia.org can look to the top of their page, hit Recent Changes and see the last 100 edits made for the whole project (each language). Until that is possible, I don't think a gateway page will work at all.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)