--- Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com wrote:
Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com wrote:
It might be a start, but it still leaves us with unreviewed crap by default.
unreviewed≠crap
Please, don't buy into what the Wikipedia naysayers spew. We have lots and lots of good content that is constantly improving;
Sure, lots of it. We also have crap, lots of it.
Then we need to work on identifying what article versions are good enough to be called stable, clearly label everything else as development, and tag appropriately within the development versions (NPOV dispute, clean-up, factual accuracy dispute, etc). We can use delayed-editing to slow down edits to some articles, protection where needed, and even some more clamping down on anons and newbies in ways that would reduce the load on the people cleaning up after them w/o harming recruitment of good editors too much. But we still have lots and lots of work to do even on the articles we already have, so we should not downplay development by hiding development versions.
-- mav
__________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com