2007/8/10, Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasievich@gmail.com:
...and if it's respectable (e.g., academic) enough, it ought to be included, balanced language and all. Which is precisely my point from the beginning. How is such policy enforcable?
Not just respectability. Importance is a point too. There's dozens, if not hundreds of different forms of cosmic inflation thought out, most by eminent cosmologists. These are highly academic and respectable, but many are also published and little more. No reason to put all of those in Wikipedia.
Say, some perceive this 'something' as a capital breach in their faith? Where to turn, then? Or just let those people "have it their way"?
NPOV - Wikipedia is not there to only state things from one belief system, however much someone believes in it.