Hmpf, passing jurgement on people you don't really know? And labeling everyone that use bokmål as "nynorskhater". I'm really curious what i'm being labeled as. Damn, this debate did really not have anything to do with nynorsk vs. bokmål, they are more or less happily coexisting with the status quo. The current debate is about calling no: bokmål or norsk.
mvh.
Lars Alvik
På 2. mar. 2005 kl. 22:39 skrev Mark Williamson:
I like "standard norwegian" - you should ignore this guy as he is a typical norwegian high-school Nynorskhater.
Mark
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:49:30 +0100, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
I got the following message on my (Dutch) userpage:
===========================================================
I don't subscribe to the mailing list, so I respond here:
The Norwegian Wikipedia uses no: as its interwiki code. Until we have decided to do otherwise, please respect our choice of domain and interwiki name.
Also, note that no: is not the "bokmål Wikipedia", as bokmål is only one spelling standard of Standard Norwegian, which also includes riksmål (both bokmål and riksmål are major spelling standards, the latter being used e.g. by the most significant Norwegian newspaper (Aftenposten). Wolfram 2 mrt 2005 15:34 (CET)
============================================================
So now I have (http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2005-February/ 037750.html) someone saying it would be best to always use nb: and (above) someone saying it would be best to always use no:. Then I have people at nn: who really don't want it to be called no: at THEIR wiki. Could someone please tell me who I am to listen to? By whom and where is the decision made in a case like this?
Andre Engels _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l