--- The Cunctator cunctator@kband.com wrote:
In essence, the image then becomes a separate document from the rest of the article, with a separate license. It may not be completely clean and is not very pretty, but I think it's the only thing we can do.
That looks like a violation of the GFDL. It's a clearcut violation of the spirit of the GFDL, and may also be an explicit violation. The Document is expected to be self-contained.
I was trying to allude to that fact with "not completely clean"; you put it a bit blunter than I would have liked :-)
Axel
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/