Erik Moeller wrote:
Well, here's the thing. Our Main Page is protected. Our Main Page links to the Brilliant Prose page, which would also be protected. The Brilliant Prose page would only link to verified revisions of articles. A user can choose this path
Main Page->Brilliant prose->Article
And they will never see an "unstable" article -- these pages would always be in a reasonable state. It is the same thing as a separate site, but happens entirely within Wikipedia.
My first reaction is to be against this; I don't like the idea of locking down pages in general, and Brilliant Prose is something I think everyone should be able to add to. But, I'm reserving judgement until there's more discussion.
Three things off the top of my head:
1. Who can add to brilliant prose? Sysops? What makes me (for example) more qualified to judge brilliant prose about the spectrum of human knowledge?
2. One of the great things about Wikipedia is that readers quickly become writers. If we were to use particular versions from article histories as stable articles, we'll need some way to allow readers to easily move into editing mode, i.e. an "Edit the current version of this article" link.
3. The synthesis of the first two concerns: what happens when there are errors in the stable version? Mistakes can be corrected in the current version, but only sysops will be able to change which version is listed on the locked Brilliant Prose page. Thus, it's possible that the "stable" version could have more errors than the "development" version of a given article.
Stephen G. ------- Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia http://www.wikipedia.org