Well, the arbitration committee request was rather broader than just the issue with Guanaco. To the point where I don't really think that there are two parties to the dispute with Lir as it stands.
-Snowspinner
On Jul 6, 2004, at 6:40 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
If there are two parties to a dispute, it would seem more sensible to consider the matter from both sides.
Ec
Phil Sandifer wrote:
I did not request arbitration against Guanaco, nor do I intend to. If you want that done, you'll have to do it yourself. -Snowspinner
On Jul 6, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Anthere wrote:
Was Guanaco presented as well ?
David Gerard wrote:
On 07/06/04 14:32, Angela wrote:
This isn't a matter for the Wikimedia Board at this early stage, nor for this mailing list. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution and follow the procedures there, taking it to arbitration, not the Board, as a last resort.
Lir has indeed been presented for arbitration on en. It's an interesting case.
- d.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l