Just what is a "reasonable" level of quality?
That depends on the person and their purpose in looking up the information.
And, the quality of an end result is very much tied to how it got there.
Of course, but does a "non-cultist" approach actually produce better content than a "cultist" one? I suspect it's just a matter of making the writers happier, which isn't a bad thing, but doesn't actually help attract readers.