On 3/4/13 2:54 AM, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
Le 2013-03-01 14:42, Sarah Stierch a écrit :
Just an FYI. virtually no one at OKF
but...like...me, and a couple of
our 30 some staff members actually use the wiki (and it's really only
for some HR documents). So, it'll most likely be left untouched or
unmaintained, by anyone. I just mention this because at our recent
staff summit we did a survey and everyone agreed that the wiki isn't
the primary spot where we work.
We're actually even considering making the wiki internal because it's
not fruitful for anyone outside of the internal community. So..don't
expect much to happen with that wiki space.
-Sarah
How do you know it will never be fruitful? Do you have any security
concern on letting information public? If no, why wasting ressources
making your workflow closed?
Hi there. I can't speak on behalf of the OKF staff as a whole. There
isn't a security concern, just not many people use it, and if we have
something that isn't being used, it might not make much sense to hold
onto it as an "asset" per se. (IMHO) Sure, we could let it sit there and
rot, but, that's not really of interest to the organization, perhaps.
The only people who are generally using it is a small group of staff and
volunteers. Most of our staff members and community members are not
wiki-users, therefore it also might not be the most comfortable space
for them to be productive and work.
If no one is really using the space for workflow, then there really
isn't much loss associated with it. Don't get me wrong - I'm a
Wikipedian and I use the wiki.
But, this isn't really the conversation to be having this. If people are
concerned I suppose they can stop by the OKF mailing list and voice some
concern about it. Or...the wiki! Heh!
-Sarah
--
*Sarah Stierch*
*/Museumist and open culture advocate/*
>Visit
sarahstierch.com
<http://sarahstierch.com><<