(Quick comment - cannot engage in the discussion now)
Fae, thanks for moving this page! I agree with this.
Sarah, I'll be using OKFN wiki, which I've been using since 2011, for organize the bylaw, board and advisory board. Let's discuss this on the OKFN channels later, it's a pity I could not go to Cambridge this year to strongly oppose that. I don't think we (OKFN) should have an internal wiki (!) and/or close it.
If OKFN stops using its wiki or closes it (I hope we don't!), we should move the page I started with Kat to meta.
Tom
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Fae faewik@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 March 2013 13:42, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
We're actually even considering making the wiki internal because it's not fruitful for anyone outside of the internal community. So..don't expect much to happen with that wiki space.
I think it would be great to have a public page like this to demonstrate our partnerships between the two organizations. It is a handy thing to point to, in order to show off some of the stuff our global networks of volunteers work together on. It seems a pity to only do this on a country-by-country basis.
The UK chapter has a page for active GLAM partnerships https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cultural_partnerships and a historical record forms part of our Annual Report (the next one will be at https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/2013_Annual_Report/Partnerships). I think doing something wider like this for a couple of close partners is sensible (i.e. those partners where our Mission greatly over-laps), so long as it can be maintained and is somewhere where we can find it again (!) ;-)
Cheers, Fae
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l