As you've probably noticed, the fundraising drive is over. It was officially completed on January 15. The current "thank you" notice will stay up until January 22 (and hopefully be translated into a few more languages over the next couple of days).
Jeremy Tobacman has been so kind to compile a graphical report on the fundraiser: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Fundraising_report
You can also continue to retrieve results from our reporting engine: http://fundraising.wikimedia.org/
The Virgin Unite donation is not accounted for yet (should happen in the next few days). Overall, the fundraiser has been a success, and some exciting new possibilities are being discussed on the Board-level.
On 19/01/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
The Virgin Unite donation is not accounted for yet (should happen in the next few days). Overall, the fundraiser has been a success, and some exciting new possibilities are being discussed on the Board-level.
So how hurt are we by making $1M rather than the hoped-for $1.5M?
- d.
In simple terms, we are still going to be struggling to keep up with our hardware purchases if our traffic remains on its trajectory. We are not going to be able to hire for all of the positions we would like to, and we don't have an operating cushion which is appropriate for our size and requirements.
In other words we can keep the wolves at bay, but not eliminate them, given this effort.
On 1/19/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/01/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
The Virgin Unite donation is not accounted for yet (should happen in the next few days). Overall, the fundraiser has been a success, and some exciting new possibilities are being discussed on the Board-level.
So how hurt are we by making $1M rather than the hoped-for $1.5M?
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I wanted to look up the detailed report that was posted to the list after the Frankfurt retreat. I have entually found it but in the process had some troubles because not realizing that Anthere has been using two different email addresses caused me to miss seeing it when searching by "Author". If any of you are familiar with using our archives, you realize how frustrating it can be to find (or not find) a message you half remember.
The thing that I realized while looking for this information is that everyone is relying much to heavily on these archives. I knew that that all the links from the past list summaries had been scrambled. I went to the WMF website hoping to find the information there after my failure in the archives. I found that the WMF website also uses links to the archives. [1] All of these links have been scrambled in the past week and the archive is gernerally not something that can be expected to be stable.
I ask you to consider making an effort to mirror any offcial messages or detailed reports either on the WMF or Meta instead of simply repairing the existing links. These messages become rather hard to find once the links go bad. If this is decided to be a bad idea for some reason; then please consider using a standardized subject for such messages. Everyone should think twice about linking to the archive in general. If you expect people to be reading what write in six months, I would encourage you to quote the message instead of linking.
Birgitte SB
[1] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home (See: "Wikimedia Board reorganization" read more link)
____________________________________________________________________________________ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
Birgitte SB wrote:
I wanted to look up the detailed report that was posted to the list after the Frankfurt retreat. I have entually found it but in the process had some troubles because not realizing that Anthere has been using two different email addresses caused me to miss seeing it when searching by "Author". If any of you are familiar with using our archives, you realize how frustrating it can be to find (or not find) a message you half remember.
Birgitte
I try now (but sometimes fail), to write announcements (board decisions, reports etc...)from my last name reference (florencedevouard), whilst email from my own person are from Anthere. Weak attempt to differenciate the chair from the ant.
I take note of your comments, and will try to post such messages on the wiki as well.
Ant
The thing that I realized while looking for this information is that everyone is relying much to heavily on these archives. I knew that that all the links from the past list summaries had been scrambled. I went to the WMF website hoping to find the information there after my failure in the archives. I found that the WMF website also uses links to the archives. [1] All of these links have been scrambled in the past week and the archive is gernerally not something that can be expected to be stable.
I ask you to consider making an effort to mirror any offcial messages or detailed reports either on the WMF or Meta instead of simply repairing the existing links. These messages become rather hard to find once the links go bad. If this is decided to be a bad idea for some reason; then please consider using a standardized subject for such messages. Everyone should think twice about linking to the archive in general. If you expect people to be reading what write in six months, I would encourage you to quote the message instead of linking.
Birgitte SB
[1] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home (See: "Wikimedia Board reorganization" read more link)
Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org