[Foundation-l] nlwiki has more spoken articles then enwiki - Wikimedia-l - lists.wikimedia.org

List overview All Threads
Download

[Foundation-l] nlwiki has more spoken articles then enwiki

[Foundation-l] all chapter board...

[Foundation-l] Board elections:...

effe iets anders

8 Jun 2008 8 Jun '08

9:59 a.m.

Hi all, although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :) Best regards, Lodewijk

Reply

Show replies by date

Florence Devouard

8 Jun 8 Jun

10:05 a.m.

effe iets anders wrote:

Hi all, although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :) Best regards, Lodewijk _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Taquin :-) Hihi Ant

Reply

Kalan

10:35 a.m.

2008/6/8, effe iets anders <effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>om>:

Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)

If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki. — Kalan

Reply

Sterkebak

11:26 a.m.

Yo Nice to hear that the dutch are better in one thing. No we must keep up the good work. Greatzz, Huib http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/gebruiker:Sterkebak

Reply

Gerard Meijssen

11:37 a.m.

Hoi, I do not know how to appreciate this. Why would anyone be proud of the number ar arbitration cases ? Are you implying that the English language arbitration system is broken ?? Thanks, GerardM On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Kalan <kalan.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:

2008/6/8, effe iets anders <effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>om>:

Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)

If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki. — Kalan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply

Jon Harald Søby

1:16 p.m.

I believe it was a joke, Gerard. A [[tongue-in-cheek]] one. 2008/6/8, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:

Hoi, I do not know how to appreciate this. Why would anyone be proud of the number ar arbitration cases ? Are you implying that the English language arbitration system is broken ?? Thanks, GerardM On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Kalan <kalan.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:

2008/6/8, effe iets anders <effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>om>:

Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)

If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki. — Kalan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

-- Jon Harald Søby http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by

Reply

Andrew Gray

4:53 p.m.

2008/6/8 Kalan <kalan.001(a)gmail.com>om>:

2008/6/8, effe iets anders <effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>om>:

Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)

If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki.

Given how much of a timesink they are on enwp, I'm amazed ruwp gets any work done! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk

Reply

Marco Chiesa

4:06 p.m.

effe iets anders ha scritto:

Hi all, although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:En-gb-congratulations.ogg Cruccone

Reply

5823

days inactive

5823

days old

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

7 comments

8 participants

tags (0)

participants (8)

Andrew Gray
effe iets anders
Florence Devouard
Gerard Meijssen
Jon Harald Søby
Kalan
Marco Chiesa
Sterkebak