Hi all,
although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :)
Best regards,
Lodewijk
effe iets anders wrote:
Hi all,
although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :)
Best regards,
Lodewijk
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Taquin :-)
Hihi
Ant
2008/6/8, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com:
Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)
If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki.
— Kalan
Yo
Nice to hear that the dutch are better in one thing. No we must keep up the good work.
Greatzz, Huib http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/gebruiker:Sterkebak
Hoi, I do not know how to appreciate this. Why would anyone be proud of the number ar arbitration cases ? Are you implying that the English language arbitration system is broken ?? Thanks, GerardM
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Kalan kalan.001@gmail.com wrote:
2008/6/8, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com:
Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)
If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki.
— Kalan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I believe it was a joke, Gerard. A [[tongue-in-cheek]] one.
2008/6/8, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, I do not know how to appreciate this. Why would anyone be proud of the number ar arbitration cases ? Are you implying that the English language arbitration system is broken ?? Thanks, GerardM
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Kalan kalan.001@gmail.com wrote:
2008/6/8, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com:
Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)
If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki.
— Kalan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
2008/6/8 Kalan kalan.001@gmail.com:
2008/6/8, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com:
Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-)
If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki.
Given how much of a timesink they are on enwp, I'm amazed ruwp gets any work done!
effe iets anders ha scritto:
Hi all,
although not such a huge mile stone, it is nice to mention that nlwikipedia is working relatively hard on spoken articles. It has currently 735 spoken articles, which is more then enwiki with 728! Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) Just to let you know :)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:En-gb-congratulations.ogg
Cruccone
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org