Wikimédia France Governance review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

Creation of separate user group...

Wikimedia Research Showcase July...

Nadine Le Lirzin

8 Jul 2018 8 Jul '18

9:43 p.m.

Hi all, As announced last month on this list[1], the Governance Assessment Report by external auditors "Associés en gouvernance" has been published, and we want to share it with you. The auditors did a great work, first in their rather good understanding of our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions they delivered. The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the rebuilding – is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at next General Assembly, by the end of the year. The document has been translated in English and is now available on Commons[2]. May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also for any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance advice or ideas. Best regards, Nadine Le Lirzin *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-June/090413.html [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_Governance_Asses…

Show replies by date

Itzik - Wikimedia Israel

9 Jul 9 Jul

6:58 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

Hi Nadine, Thank you for sharing the report with us. I just gave a quick look at it, and I printed it so I could read it on the flight to Cape Town. But I agree with you that it's an important review and the recommendations are important and may be useful for all of us! Itzik *Itzik Edri* Chairperson itzik(a)wikimedia.org.il +972-54-5878078 On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr> wrote:

...

Hi all, As announced last month on this list[1], the Governance Assessment Report by external auditors "Associés en gouvernance" has been published, and we want to share it with you. The auditors did a great work, first in their rather good understanding of our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions they delivered. The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the rebuilding – is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at next General Assembly, by the end of the year. The document has been translated in English and is now available on Commons[2]. May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also for any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance advice or ideas. Best regards, Nadine Le Lirzin *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018- June/090413.html [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_ Governance_Assessment_Report_-_2018.pdf _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Cornelius Kibelka

10:04 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

Thank you very much, Nadine! As it is, as far as I remember, the third governance review of a Wikimedia affiliate, I just created a page on Meta where they can be collected. Feel free to add/modify: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Governance_Review Cheers Cornelius On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 08:59, Itzik - Wikimedia Israel < itzik(a)wikimedia.org.il> wrote:

...

our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions they delivered. The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the

rebuilding

– is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at next General Assembly, by the end of the year. The document has been translated in English and is now available on Commons[2]. May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also

for

any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance advice or ideas. Best regards, Nadine Le Lirzin *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018- June/090413.html [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_ Governance_Assessment_Report_-_2018.pdf _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-- Cornelius Kibelka Program and Engagement Coordinator (PEC) for the Wikimedia Conference Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0 http://wikimedia.de Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei! http://spenden.wikimedia.de/ Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207

David Cuenca Tudela

10:13 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

Hi Nadine, Thanks for sharing the document with us. I read it and I found interesting to see the different clashes: - there is no awareness of the individual interpretations of our mission - the community wants anarchism in order to feel free, however the organization needs some kind of structure and specialization to be effective - lobbing, advocacy, and governance are necessary for the community, but since they are "invisible" activities, they are not valued by the community - there is a big wish for openness in the community, however governance requires some privacy as well - employees can have too much influence in any organization if they participate, but it is unfair to exclude them - the WMF exercises power over the movement organizations, but the organizations cannot exercise power over the WMF, creating a power unbalance and mistrust Besides of the recommendations on the document, it feels that there is the need for more dialogue with involved parties to create a mutual understanding. In the end it is a matter of trust, we can only trust something if we know it, and if we understand the benefits that it creates for us. I hope these topics are discussed in the Movement Strategy. Regards, Micru On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr> wrote:

...

-- Etiamsi omnes, ego non

Chris Keating

11:44 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

Congratulations to Wikimedia France for undertaking this review and publishing the results. I believe all of the 3 governance reviews are important reading for anyone involved with the WMF or any of the affiliates, and all have important lessons for the movement. It's interesting to note that this is the first one that touches on the WMF-affiliate relationship in much detail. Also - while so far governance reviews have only happened as a result of a crisis, this doesn't have to be the case! I would urge Wikimedia affiliates to take external advice on their governance, the suggestions offered by governance experts who know the laws, norms and cutlure in which you operate will be very helpful for you. Chris (who was Chair of Wikimedia UK at the point we had a governance review...) On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr> wrote:

...

Alphos OGame

12:02 p.m.

Forgive my (usual ?) bluntness, but I don't think congratulations are in order for undertaking the governance review ;-) As a member and unwilling observer, I can tell you it was dearly needed, be it by internal or external auditors, and mandated by the WMF. However, as a long time member of the community and of Wikimedia France, I do salute the effort of publishing the results of the review, as the previous board of directors probably wouldn't have wanted to publish anything critical of their method of governance ; and the review covers both old and more recent times. That indeed deserves credit, so thank you Nadine ! @ Cornelius : smart thinking on your part, collecting them in one place. I hope there won't be any more crisis requiring a governance review in one of our chapters, but in any case it will be interesting for all chapters to know what to avoid in the future, and where to look for it, so thank you as well. Roger / Alphos

...

Le 9 juil. 2018 à 13:44, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki(a)gmail.com> a écrit : Congratulations to Wikimedia France for undertaking this review and publishing the results. I believe all of the 3 governance reviews are important reading for anyone involved with the WMF or any of the affiliates, and all have important lessons for the movement. It's interesting to note that this is the first one that touches on the WMF-affiliate relationship in much detail. Also - while so far governance reviews have only happened as a result of a crisis, this doesn't have to be the case! I would urge Wikimedia affiliates to take external advice on their governance, the suggestions offered by governance experts who know the laws, norms and cutlure in which you operate will be very helpful for you. Chris (who was Chair of Wikimedia UK at the point we had a governance review...)

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr> wrote: Hi all, As announced last month on this list[1], the Governance Assessment Report by external auditors "Associés en gouvernance" has been published, and we want to share it with you. The auditors did a great work, first in their rather good understanding of our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions they delivered. The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the rebuilding – is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at next General Assembly, by the end of the year. The document has been translated in English and is now available on Commons[2]. May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also for any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance advice or ideas. Best regards, Nadine Le Lirzin *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-June/090413.html [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_Governance_Asses… _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Balázs Viczián

11 Jul 11 Jul

5:36 a.m.

This report is pretty useful in terms of comparing my chapter's policies to this. Probably some fine tuning will follow. Thank you for sharing! Note the pattern: UK, Germany, France, all 'big' chapters. My guess is that the next one will very likely to be another 'large' chapter (100+ members, multiple employees, many paralel projects etc) As the report says very few has at least some experience in running organizations (true worldwide) so no suprise such events happen every few years, not to say those that stay 'local'. Just having 50-100-150k edits is not enough to be a 'boss' Would love to see people management skills workshops, and organizational skills (logistics) workshops...but I attend an event only every 2-3 years (or less), so this is just an almost silent suggestion :) Balazs 2018. júl. 10. 7:44 ezt írta ("Alphos OGame" <alphos.ogame(a)gmail.com>)m>): Forgive my (usual ?) bluntness, but I don't think congratulations are in order for undertaking the governance review ;-) As a member and unwilling observer, I can tell you it was dearly needed, be it by internal or external auditors, and mandated by the WMF. However, as a long time member of the community and of Wikimedia France, I do salute the effort of publishing the results of the review, as the previous board of directors probably wouldn't have wanted to publish anything critical of their method of governance ; and the review covers both old and more recent times. That indeed deserves credit, so thank you Nadine ! @ Cornelius : smart thinking on your part, collecting them in one place. I hope there won't be any more crisis requiring a governance review in one of our chapters, but in any case it will be interesting for all chapters to know what to avoid in the future, and where to look for it, so thank you as well. Roger / Alphos

...

Le 9 juil. 2018 à 13:44, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki(a)gmail.com> a

écrit :

...

Congratulations to Wikimedia France for undertaking this review and publishing the results. I believe all of the 3 governance reviews are important reading for anyone involved with the WMF or any of the affiliates, and all have important lessons for the movement. It's interesting to note that this is the first one that touches on the WMF-affiliate relationship in much detail. Also - while so far governance reviews have only happened as a result of a crisis, this doesn't have to be the case! I would urge Wikimedia affiliates to take external advice on their governance, the suggestions offered by governance experts who know the laws, norms and cutlure in which you operate will be very helpful for you. Chris (who was Chair of Wikimedia UK at the point we had a governance review...) > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr>

wrote:

...

> > Hi all, > > As announced last month on this list[1], the Governance Assessment Report > by external auditors "Associés en gouvernance" has been published, and we > want to share it with you. > > The auditors did a great work, first in their rather good understanding

...

> our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions > they delivered. > > The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the

rebuilding

...

> – is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at next > General Assembly, by the end of the year. > > The document has been translated in English and is now available on > Commons[2]. > > May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also

for

...

> any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance advice > or ideas. > > Best regards, > > Nadine Le Lirzin > *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* > > > [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-

June/090413.html

...

> [2] > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_

Governance_Assessment_Report_-_2018.pdf

...

> _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

...

> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

...

_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

...

New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

Asaf Bartov

5:50 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:36 AM Balázs Viczián <balazs.viczian(a)wikimedia.hu> wrote:

...

Would love to see people management skills workshops, and organizational skills (logistics) workshops...but I attend an event only every 2-3 years (or less), so this is just an almost silent suggestion :)

Wikimedia conference in recent years have indeed been putting more and more of an emphasis on people skills and governance skills. Learning Days[1] and the pre-conference Board Training[2] at this year's WMCON are one example, but regional and national conference have been seeing more interest in these skills too. Cheers, A. [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Learning_and_Evaluation/News/Learning_Days_… [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2018/Pre-Conference_Bo…

Michael Peel

10:58 p.m.

Nominally, the WMF is going to be the next Wikimedia organisation to do a governance review, as per: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_recommendations/2015-2016_ro… https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2017-11-17,18,19#Governance_Re… Thanks, Mike

...

On 11 Jul 2018, at 02:36, Balázs Viczián <balazs.viczian(a)wikimedia.hu> wrote: This report is pretty useful in terms of comparing my chapter's policies to this. Probably some fine tuning will follow. Thank you for sharing! Note the pattern: UK, Germany, France, all 'big' chapters. My guess is that the next one will very likely to be another 'large' chapter (100+ members, multiple employees, many paralel projects etc) As the report says very few has at least some experience in running organizations (true worldwide) so no suprise such events happen every few years, not to say those that stay 'local'. Just having 50-100-150k edits is not enough to be a 'boss' Would love to see people management skills workshops, and organizational skills (logistics) workshops...but I attend an event only every 2-3 years (or less), so this is just an almost silent suggestion :) Balazs 2018. júl. 10. 7:44 ezt írta ("Alphos OGame" <alphos.ogame(a)gmail.com>)m>): Forgive my (usual ?) bluntness, but I don't think congratulations are in order for undertaking the governance review ;-) As a member and unwilling observer, I can tell you it was dearly needed, be it by internal or external auditors, and mandated by the WMF. However, as a long time member of the community and of Wikimedia France, I do salute the effort of publishing the results of the review, as the previous board of directors probably wouldn't have wanted to publish anything critical of their method of governance ; and the review covers both old and more recent times. That indeed deserves credit, so thank you Nadine ! @ Cornelius : smart thinking on your part, collecting them in one place. I hope there won't be any more crisis requiring a governance review in one of our chapters, but in any case it will be interesting for all chapters to know what to avoid in the future, and where to look for it, so thank you as well. Roger / Alphos

Le 9 juil. 2018 à 13:44, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki(a)gmail.com> a

écrit :

Congratulations to Wikimedia France for undertaking this review and publishing the results. I believe all of the 3 governance reviews are important reading for anyone involved with the WMF or any of the affiliates, and all have important lessons for the movement. It's interesting to note that this is the first one that touches on the WMF-affiliate relationship in much detail. Also - while so far governance reviews have only happened as a result of a crisis, this doesn't have to be the case! I would urge Wikimedia affiliates to take external advice on their governance, the suggestions offered by governance experts who know the laws, norms and cutlure in which you operate will be very helpful for you. Chris (who was Chair of Wikimedia UK at the point we had a governance review...) > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr>

wrote:

> our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement suggestions > they delivered. > > The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the

rebuilding

for

June/090413.html

> [2] > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_

Governance_Assessment_Report_-_2018.pdf

> _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Balázs Viczián

12 Jul 12 Jul

4:59 a.m.

New subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimédia France Governance review

Thank you Asaf. This seems to be a mixture of ppl mgmt and org skills, shifted heavily towards the latter. The last time I was at wmcon was 2014 [1] when this was bearly a topic at all, only touched it here and there a bit, when it was inevitable. Good to see the progress on this. Hi Mike, perhaps in the future one could undergo such a review before a crisis happens. Like a medical checkup, not yearly thoufh, but say every 3-5 years to prevent/treat in early stage such events. So far all governance reviews (including this) were responses to a collapse. [1] https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2014 Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net> ezt írta (2018. július 12., csütörtök):

...

Nominally, the WMF is going to be the next Wikimedia organisation to do a governance review, as per: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_recommendations/2015-2016_ round_2#Wikimedia_Foundation https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2017-11-17, 18,19#Governance_Review Thanks, Mike

On 11 Jul 2018, at 02:36, Balázs Viczián <balazs.viczian(a)wikimedia.hu>

wrote:

This report is pretty useful in terms of comparing my chapter's policies

this. Probably some fine tuning will follow. Thank you for sharing! Note the pattern: UK, Germany, France, all 'big' chapters. My guess is

that

the next one will very likely to be another 'large' chapter (100+

members,

multiple employees, many paralel projects etc) As the report says very few has at least some experience in running organizations (true worldwide) so no suprise such events happen every few years, not to say those that stay 'local'. Just having 50-100-150k edits is not enough to be a 'boss' Would love to see people management skills workshops, and organizational skills (logistics) workshops...but I attend an event only every 2-3 years (or less), so this is just an almost silent suggestion :) Balazs 2018. júl. 10. 7:44 ezt írta ("Alphos OGame" <alphos.ogame(a)gmail.com>)m>): Forgive my (usual ?) bluntness, but I don't think congratulations are in order for undertaking the governance review ;-) As a member and unwilling observer, I can tell you it was dearly needed,

it by internal or external auditors, and mandated by the WMF. However, as a long time member of the community and of Wikimedia France,

do salute the effort of publishing the results of the review, as the previous board of directors probably wouldn't have wanted to publish anything critical of their method of governance ; and the review covers both old and more recent times. That indeed deserves credit, so thank you Nadine ! @ Cornelius : smart thinking on your part, collecting them in one place.

hope there won't be any more crisis requiring a governance review in one

our chapters, but in any case it will be interesting for all chapters to know what to avoid in the future, and where to look for it, so thank you

well. Roger / Alphos

Le 9 juil. 2018 à 13:44, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki(a)gmail.com> a

écrit : > > Congratulations to Wikimedia France for undertaking this review and > publishing the results. > > I believe all of the 3 governance reviews are important reading for > anyone involved with the WMF or any of the affiliates, and all have > important lessons for the movement. It's interesting to note that this > is the first one that touches on the WMF-affiliate relationship in > much detail. > > Also - while so far governance reviews have only happened as a result > of a crisis, this doesn't have to be the case! I would urge Wikimedia > affiliates to take external advice on their governance, the > suggestions offered by governance experts who know the laws, norms and > cutlure in which you operate will be very helpful for you. > > Chris > (who was Chair of Wikimedia UK at the point we had a governance

review...)

>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM Nadine Le Lirzin <

nlelirzin(a)wikimedia.fr>

wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As announced last month on this list[1], the Governance Assessment

Report

>> by external auditors "Associés en gouvernance" has been published, and

> want to share it with you. > > The auditors did a great work, first in their rather good understanding

of >> our movement complexity, and then in the numerous improvement

suggestions

> they delivered. > > The consultation of our members – to fully associate them to the

rebuilding >> – is still in progress. Main changes will be submitted to a vote at

> General Assembly, by the end of the year. > > The document has been translated in English and is now available on > Commons[2]. > > May these suggestions be useful not only for Wikimédia France, but also

for >> any other chapter or affiliate that would be in need of governance

advice

> or ideas. > > Best regards, > > Nadine Le Lirzin > *Wikimedia France Board Secretary* > > > [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-

June/090413.html

> [2] > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_France_-_

Governance_Assessment_Report_-_2018.pdf

> _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l

New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

2116

days inactive

2120

days old

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

9 comments

9 participants

tags (0)

participants (9)

Alphos OGame
Asaf Bartov
Balázs Viczián
Chris Keating
Cornelius Kibelka
David Cuenca Tudela
Itzik - Wikimedia Israel
Michael Peel
Nadine Le Lirzin