On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:17:18 +0100, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't describe a short article as
"hardly useful for creation" I
created
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass,_California only
three years and already the current article is five times the size of
what I created. It still has some of my original content, and some has
been spunoff into an even bigger new article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass_rare_earth_mine
Who knows how much those small articles will grow in future years and
decades.
WereSpielChequers
>
I probably did not express myself correctly. What I meant, for example, is
that this article in Great Soviet Encyclopaedia (it is in Russian, but you
can easily estimate the amount of information it contains)
http://bse.sci-lib.com/article067276.html
would be good for the first two lines of this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuloy_River_(Vaga)
but to get a decent article (not a stub) I had to use additional material,
including topographic maps. In principle, I could just make a two-line
stub, it would be useful in any case.
Cheers
Yaroslav