I posted a question in the comment group[1] of Khan Academy[2], a great education website.
In fact in this page on the wiki of the site[3] under "Our Principles: the rules of the game", is said: "Openness. [...] Open content means that all content distributed by or through the Khan Academy uses the CC-by-sa license (or a compatible license) [...]" but actually in the footer of every page the is indicated a CC-3.0-NC-BY-SA license.
So there must be a mistake somewhere, the point being that CC-BY-SA license would be compatible with Wikipedia and the other projects, which I think would be a great, valuable thing.
Can somebody help me to clarify this point? I think it's important.
Cristian
[1]http://groups.google.com/group/khan-academy-comments/browse_thread/thread/41... [2]www.khanacademy.org [3]https://sites.google.com/a/khanacademy.org/forge/home/mission-principles-and...
I think they use the NC-ND version (at least that is the one in youtube videos), as an example, this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0Y8ia57C24 has this tag:
*LICENCE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works). *
*For more information about this licence, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.*
_____ *Béria Lima* http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos.*
On 31 October 2011 21:24, Cristian Consonni kikkocristian@gmail.com wrote:
I posted a question in the comment group[1] of Khan Academy[2], a great education website.
In fact in this page on the wiki of the site[3] under "Our Principles: the rules of the game", is said: "Openness. [...] Open content means that all content distributed by or through the Khan Academy uses the CC-by-sa license (or a compatible license) [...]" but actually in the footer of every page the is indicated a CC-3.0-NC-BY-SA license.
So there must be a mistake somewhere, the point being that CC-BY-SA license would be compatible with Wikipedia and the other projects, which I think would be a great, valuable thing.
Can somebody help me to clarify this point? I think it's important.
Cristian
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/khan-academy-comments/browse_thread/thread/41... [2]www.khanacademy.org [3] https://sites.google.com/a/khanacademy.org/forge/home/mission-principles-and...
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org