On 10/31/2011 10:09 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Robin McCain, 31/10/2011 17:20:
> >> We must also remember that the wiki edit interface and markup can be a
> >> little intimidating to a newbie, so opening an edit window and making no
> >> changes may be more common than we think. Are there any stats on this?
> Yes, it was something like 70 % of "edit" clicks are not followed by
> save. It's difficuilt to tell how many of those were people (or even
> stupid bots) looking for the source text.
For me, the most common reason why
an "edit" click is not followed by a
"save" is because I end up not having the time to complete the work, or
the edit I had in mind becomes more complicated than I thought
(sometimes the latter partly explains the former). To put it
idiomatically, it's a reaction to biting off more than I can chew.
That may not be entirely typical, but in the sense of "editing proved
more difficult than anticipated" it probably explains many abortive
attempts at editing. I suppose it's been suggested before, but I think
more fine-grained section editing capability, so you can simply
highlight any portion of an article and open an edit window for just
that portion, could be helpful.
--Michael Snow
Unless a page is extremely short, it is a good idea to throw in a
few
===section=== headers here and there to make it easier to edit just one
section. I would think that an editors time would be much better spent
adding a few of these to a new entry rather than waste time telling
someone their new topic isn't important enough to be included.
As for the "freeze" you experience, we've all had such moments -
especially when trying to apply for grants online - where every
character counts and you only have one chance to make the maximum
positive impact. I learned a long time ago to write my stuff in a text
editor then cut & paste into a html form for markup - avoids butterflies
in the stomach. :-)