I hope those procedures are fixed with a high priority. Because privacy is a
serious issue, and users are referred to the ombudsmen committee often,
assuming that is fully functional if necessary. If it is not, that means a
lot more responsibility for the WMF, the stewards etc. Are the current
members still willing to perform their tasks, are they able to? I hope this
gets fixed very fast.
Thanks,
Lodewijk
2009/7/27 Christophe Henner <christophe.henner(a)gmail.com>
2009/7/27 geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>om>:
2009/7/26 effe iets anders
<effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Has this issue been resolved? I think it would be quite serious if the
> committee is not functioning, so would like to get some confirmation
here.
Thanks.
Lodewijk
Doesn't appear to be.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I'm working on it for a few days.
By the way, this isn't the first time the Ombudsman Commission is
"laggy". I would think that a mailing list isn't the best tool to work
on cases.
--
Christophe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l