On Aug 10, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Gianluigi Gamba wrote:
2007/8/10, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
...It seems that unless we can well-specify what the topics of
each list
would be, it would be an arbitrary split which would mean that
interested people would be subscribed to both lists, anyway.
Please, let's be careful not to create too many communications
channels to
be watched.
The idea of a new list doesn't turn me on that much. But if it's
considered
useful, ok.
G.
"too much information running through my brain
too much information driving me insane"
(the Police, 1981)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I agree with Gianluigi. I think the idea of a community-l list is
probably a good thing, but for the life of me I can't think of a good
definition of what should be on that list, other than "community
related things that don't directly refer to the foundation, so
shouldn't be on foundation-l." and I am rather uncomfortable with the
idea of a list so generally defined, for the sake of having a list.
But if someone can come up with a good definition for it I'd be all
for it.
-dan