Marc,
Oldak said exactly what I was meaning, so his reply
is probably more elegant than mine.
By "flaunting their sexuality," I was referring to being openly
gay with a partner, holding hands, sharing a room, that kind
of thing. I guess "flaunting" was a bad choice of words, "publicly
displaying" would probably be closer to my point.
Sorry for any confusion.
-Chad
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
on 3/6/08 7:34 AM, Chad at innocentkiller(a)gmail.com
wrote:
I would say so. Mike seems to think that as long
as the
wikimedian gay community doesn't flaunt their sexuality
(as gay men in the US seem to do all the time), they
should be fine.
-Chad
Chad, what exactly does "flaunt their sexuality" mean to you?
Marc Riddell
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:37 PM, John Reaves <johnreaveswp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So is it really worth having the conference there
if steps like this are
necessary?
--John Reaves
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Mike Godwin <mgodwin(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
"We are actively looking for a professional
threat-
assessment firm to consult regarding the full range of possible
threats we might have to deal with in holding and attending the
conference." <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l