Le 2013-04-03 12:34, Michael Peel a écrit :
# Agreements, particularly those with global impact,
and/or where
they affect more than one Wikimedia organisation. Part of the recent
Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia situation was caused by a lack of
transparency about who had signed what agreements, and when they had
been signed - if these had all been shared on an internal wiki then
some of this could have been avoided. There's also a lot of
experience
now with existing agreements that could be reused when new agreements
are being written, e.g. for Wikimedians in Residences. Sadly, not all
of these can be made publicly available (or at least, they haven't
been to date).
Can you provide more information on this case? I never heard about
Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia despite they had a "global impact".
Would anyone be kind enough to explain me what kind of secret stuff we
are talking about?
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/