Hoi,
You do not want to talk, but you have a reason to talk and complain to
others.. so you make your bed and now you lay in it. It is not a zero sum
game.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Nov 12, 2007 11:54 AM, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
NotACow/kayrnn/Kelly is the person issuing the ban on
#wikipedia and
#wikimedia-ops. All of those layers are hence useless as she so far
refused to communicate using a non-irc method such as my wikipedia
talk page or email. I do not want to talk to NotACow/kayrnn/Kelly
directly on IRC as I ignored her permanently so as not to rise the
temperature unnecessarily as we end up annoying each other
unintentionally.
I can't publicly post the log here but can email it to you (in fact
I'll forwarded it after sending this).
- White Cat
On Nov 12, 2007 12:37 PM, Sean Whitton <sean(a)silentflame.com> wrote:
On 11/12/07, Angela <beesley(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
[snip]
The contacts are listed on meta, but they're
not there to resolve
personal disputes you have with people on IRC. As the page says "the
contacts have a policy of staying out of channel affairs..."
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_Group_Contacts
For the record, I am the person to go to at the moment rather than
James as he has delegated 99% of the work to me due to other
commitments. You are right though that we try to stay out of this at
all costs. The correct order for escalation of issues is the
following, but really anything past the first few layers is a last
resort:
For #wikipedia:
Op who banned
#wikimedia-ops (where I hope bans are used extremely sparingly)
Deputy Channel Contact, NotACow/kayrnn/Kelly
Channel Contact: Mark_Ryan
IRC Group Contacts
Sean
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l