David Gerard wrote:
Angela (beesley(a)gmail.com) [050908 06:06]:
I've been thinking this over for a few days,
and I believe the option
of reunifying meta and the Foundation wiki makes most sense. The
separation means little to external people and only causes extra work
for internal people. If we need pages to be uneditable, we can just
protect them rather than hiding them on a less visited, less wiki,
site.
I predict the first thing to happen will be a pile of spurious deletion
nominations.
- d.
It goes without saying that this should not be done at the expense of
all the sometimes borderline pages sitting on meta. By borderline, I in
particular refer to
* the humor pages, frequently proposed for deletions
* the personal opinions
* etc...
I like the proposal in the sense the current situation is not practical.
I do not like it because I fear it will result in a sort of censorship,
with pages kept only those being of that awful CPOV. I wonder if
something like a namespace "foundation" could be created within meta,
which would clearly mention these pages are "official" (whatever that
means" while others may reflect other opinions.
Ant