List administration is a list administrators job. I am totaly fine
with it if the list administrators handle the administration,
including new admin-appointments. This kind of stuff is not something
to decide on the list itself. I am fine with elaborations etc, I don't
care. But on the other side, I just go with Michael here, I trust his
judgement on what is needed and who is better. (this unless there is a
huge major problem with a new or old admin on a structural basis of
course)
kr, lodewijk
2008/8/17 Jon <scream(a)datascreamer.com>om>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
effe iets anders wrote:
folks, please. If Michael thinks he's a good
guy, I'm fine with it. I
don't think that mawning on how he made the choice etc will help a
lot. Welcome, Ral315!
I would also be very interested to know why there was no response to my
offer to volunteer. There was one other public offer, and he is very
active on the list as well. I am not understanding.
- --
Best,
Jon
[User:NonvocalScream]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkinZ7YACgkQ6+ro8Pm1AtVAAwCfSFW99CqURrF+o9XhfJoU3c1C
j74An3suJwQl4XVR/F1Ewxgjpmq78bue
=DU9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----