Interesting. So nearly everything is covered by a place of work. So there
opinion appears to be that the NC license is simple a way to pretend one is
using an open license well changing nothing.
On Sat, May 18, 2019, 18:42 Yury Bulka <setthemfree(a)privacyrequired.com>
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just stumbled upon an page where Swiss collecting society SUISA lists
things which they consider commercial use within CC NC licenses, as
applied to works they have copyright on (delegated from authors who are
their members). It's quite interesting and I think it is a very good
example for advocating for fully free/libre licensing of works.
Here's the page:
https://www.suisa.ch/en/members/authors/how-to-register-a-work/creative-com…
The list of uses that they consider commercial use is quite
interesting. For instance, it includes things like:
- involving a counterpart, of a financial or other nature, regardless of
the beneficiary, title or grounds;
- in exchange for other goods, whether or not the exchange generates
direct or indirect revenues or gives rise to a payment of any nature
whatsoever;
- at places of work;
Best,
Yury.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>