I agree as well. At least at short list of the main
topics would help a lot.
Regards,
Cornelius
----
Cornelius Kibelka
@jaancornelius
+49-1520-7226062
On 7 January 2013 00:30, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Thomas, I have to admit :)
Having a brief "in summary" of what links comprise of is common practice
and would be fabulous!
Every second counts in this world of mass stimulation and information. :)
Sarah
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 6, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 6, 2013 11:06 PM, "Ziko van
Dijk" <vandijk(a)wmnederland.nl> wrote:
I don't see a reason for this tone, and I think that everyone who is
interested in the reports will easily find them.
The problem is, it's hard to know if you are interested in the report
without having any idea what it contains. A short summary, or at least a
list of contents, helps you decide whether to click on the link or not.
(If
the report is already a fairly short summary,
just include the whole
thing.)
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: