The copyright requirement isn't attribution; it's attribution and copyleft retention for derived works.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:28 AM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
It search result only contains a snippet (and thus is fair use). Plus Google provide attribution in a lot of their results.
J
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:03 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2017 at 18:32, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Both Google and Graphiq are using pretty much the entire Wikipedia
corpus
for their results.
However due to the way their output is structured it falls under "you can't copyright facts".
-- geni
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe