The copyright requirement isn't attribution; it's attribution and copyleft
retention for derived works.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:28 AM, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It search result only contains a snippet (and thus is
fair use). Plus
Google provide attribution in a lot of their results.
J
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:03 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 June 2017 at 18:32, The Cunctator
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Both Google and Graphiq are using pretty much the entire Wikipedia
corpus
for their
results.
However due to the way their output is structured it falls under "you
can't copyright facts".
--
geni
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>