Well, to Steven's point that you might need a jurisdiction where corporate
officers and employees aren't subject to extradition... I believe Germany
does in fact have an extradition treaty with the United States.
So far the criteria I'm hearing from the comments here:
1) Politically stable
2) Liberal political environment
3) Strong protections against government interference in relevant operations
4) Section 230-like protection against liability for user content
5) No natural disasters like fires, floods, hurricanes, volcanoes, etc.
6) Strong technological sophistication - preferably a robust technology
industry that can supply local talent for WMF needs
7) Protections in the law for data privacy
8) Availability of renewable energy sources and other resources that allow
for operation of the WMF with a low climate impact
9) Tax exemption or beneficial tax structure for receiving international
fundings by donation
10) Clear and reliable regulatory framework for a charitable organization
11) Safe - low crime, low-risk of violence for WMF stakeholders and
community
12) Free from risk of extradition to the U.S. or other jurisdictions where
criminal or civil law might be used against WMF officers or employees
I would guess the list of countries that meet all of these criteria might
be short. Norway might hit most of these except the last.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:44 PM Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net> wrote:
โฆ hence the existence of Wikimedia chapters? I suspect
at least WMDE could
take this on if it becomes necessary, although other chapters arenโt as
technologically developed as Iโd have liked to have seen.
Thanks,
Mike
On 30 Sep 2020, at 19:35, Steven Walling
<steven.walling(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
SJ hinted at a related problem which is that we'd also need a backup
organizational structure to run things operationally and legally. If the
US
becomes so politically unstable that hosting
Wikimedia data is under
threat
there, just moving the data would not be enough.
You'd also have to
include
a contingency plan that foresaw the need to
legally operate the
Foundation
(or an equivalent organization anyway) under a
different jurisdiction
with corporate officers not subject to US law or extradition. If the
servers are hosted in the EU but the legally controlling body and its
employees are within the US, you could still see them legally forced to
comply with an order, just like companies are forced to do so in
other countries with censorious regimes today.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:59 AM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> We should have technical partners in multiple other jurisdictions that
> could help in a crisis, and load bearing infrastructure in at least one
of
> them, and a plan for how and when to switch.
(The walkthrough of what
would
> be needed for a smooth transfer send most
important, and useful for
general
> reliability planning)
>
> We should also fully support and realize Wikimedia-on-ipfs, similar to
what
> the internet archive had been doing.
(Santhosh has some excellent ideas
> there)
>
> ๐๐๐๐
>
> On Wed., Sep. 30, 2020, 5:35 a.m. Dan Garry (Deskana), <
djgwiki(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 09:49, Erik Moeller <eloquence(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> I hope that some preliminary contingency plans exist or are being
>>> developed, and I'm sure that the movement-wide debate will widen if
>>> the US continues its downward slide into authoritarianism.
>>>
>>
>> I agree with Erik. Even under the Obama administration, there were
> threats
>> to the existence of the movement, such as SOPA [1] which lead to a
> blackout
>> [2]. One can extrapolate from current events that these threats could
> well
>> get larger and more frequent, rather than smaller and less frequent,
> should
>> someone in the US Government decide to focus their attention on
attacking
>> Wikipedia and free knowledge. It would be
prudent to create a
contingency
>> plan which includes an exploration of
other options for a location of
>> operation for the Wikimedia Foundation and/or its servers, with their
>> advantages and disadvantages. I personally wouldn't necessarily
advocate
>> for making the plan public; that would be
ideal, but I'd be comforted
>> merely to know it exists.
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:36, Joseph Seddon <josephseddon(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe options are going to be explored for sustainability but
right
>> now
>>> legally speaking the US is the best jurisdiction for hosting us now
and
>> the
>>> foreseeable future.
>>>
>>
>> I agree with this too. For now, the United States remains the best
place
>> for the organisation to operate out of,
and a move should not be
actively
>> considered.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> [1]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act
>> [2]:
>>
>>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA#Wikimedia_commโฆ
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>