"Moving forward" would involve directly addressing and fixing this shocking
example of board malgovernance, not corporate-doublespeaking about the
future in a way that avoids any and all culpability and transparency for
this gross ethical lapse. This doesn't need to be "explained" to us; it
needs to be remedied. Preferably with pen, paper, and farewells for the
pushers of this latest débâcle.
Best,
Dan
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:27 PM <aketon(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hello again,
Thank you to everyone that has provided valuable feedback. Moving forward,
we will articulate and follow the best practices that emerge from these
important discussions and our corresponding review of the attendant
policies, procedures, and practices. Developing a more clear and consistent
policy approach to future decisions is important for us.
Maggie had been planning to do a community office hour in July in order to
avoid conflicting with annual plan discussions and Movement Strategy
meetings. We’ve decided instead to host that time next week. I’ll be there
as General Counsel and also as a member of the transition team and am
working to see if the other members of the Transition Team or Board of
Trustees will be able to join me so we can discuss any further questions or
concerns you may have. I’m prioritizing doing this sooner over making sure
everyone can attend. It’s less notice than we would like to give, but
otherwise it would be well into July before we’d be able. The time and
details will be coming very soon, hopefully tomorrow.
Best regards,
Amanda
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org