+1 on them having their own crat and admins since they were approved, what
possible harm could that have? they can always self-correct as the community
gets bigger is the choices are not optimum.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Philippe|Wiki <philippe.wiki(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
While we can always learn from best practices, I
firmly believe it's
best to leave local governance to local communities.
If they want to have admins and crats, and have set up an election
system with appropriate controls and a system of checks and balances,
good for them.
__________________
Philippe|Wiki
philippe.wiki(a)gmail.com
[[en:User:Philippe]]
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Huib Laurens wrote:
Hello,
why should a wiki have a bureaucrat before it is created?
A lot of small wikis doesn't have a crat and stewards will do the job.
The same for admins, why not keep the test admins. I don't see why it
is important to have admins before a wiki is created or has a
comnunety.
Best regards,
--
Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but pictures
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SterkeBak
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Best Regards,
Muhammad Alsebaey