+1 on them having their own crat and admins since they were approved, what possible harm could that have? they can always self-correct as the community gets bigger is the choices are not optimum.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Philippe|Wiki philippe.wiki@gmail.comwrote:
While we can always learn from best practices, I firmly believe it's best to leave local governance to local communities.
If they want to have admins and crats, and have set up an election system with appropriate controls and a system of checks and balances, good for them.
Philippe|Wiki philippe.wiki@gmail.com
[[en:User:Philippe]]
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Huib Laurens wrote:
Hello,
why should a wiki have a bureaucrat before it is created?
A lot of small wikis doesn't have a crat and stewards will do the job.
The same for admins, why not keep the test admins. I don't see why it is important to have admins before a wiki is created or has a comnunety.
Best regards,
-- Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but pictures
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SterkeBak
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l