No, they most certainly would not. However it's a bit of a moot point
as if I recall correctly there were only 1 or 2 admins and they've
both left since.
Mark
On 9/1/09, Peter Gervai <grinapo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 08:29, Mark
Williamson<node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It certainly should, ideally, be the same
Wikipedia - in my opinion
the ideal situation would have a converter on ro.wp. However, I don't
think most Romanian Wikipedians would approve of this (as I mentioned
earlier in the thread).
A worrying sidenote: cheking the page
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Mo…
seem to reveal that most of the people go for deletion of the mowp are
Romanians. Would they support to have old mowp admins as rowp admins,
wouldn't they?
g
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l