Ray Saintonge wrote:
Sue Gardner wrote:
1) There has been a very active strand about
Jimmy's actions over the
past week and his scope of authority, which I think is now resolving.
That's mostly happened here and on meta.
What made that one easier to resolve is that the problem could be easily
defined, and very specific solutions could be clearly enunciated.
The longer term and more important problems do not adapt very well to
easy definitions.
Right, the problem was never just Jimmy. The board were
also complicit, so Jimmy shouldn't be made to carry the
can.
I dearly hope none of the staff were complicit, because
they would be even further away from their remit than
the Board of Trustees.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen