Pe duminică, 8 ianuarie 2023, Amir Sarabadani <ladsgroup(a)gmail.com> a scris:
Maybe I'm missing something obvious. Feel free to
correct me if I'm
wrong, privately or publicly.
I would be very surprised (and worried, mind you!) to find out that the WMF
has the data needed to *reliably* link users and organizations for
state-sponsored entities. The WMF is actively minimizing the amount of data
it gathers on visitors and limits it to their own sites, while commercial
companies are very creative in finding new ways to track their users
without their consent between various media and domains.
Lacking that reliable identification, making statements related to state
affiliation is almost certainly exposing the foundation to serious legal
liability.
That doesn't mean that I disagree with the idea that this has been poorly
communicated; nitpicking on jargon is not helping send the right message
out. At the very least internal communication should explain that state
"infiltration" is always a risk, regardless of country and project
(remember the case on French Wikipedia a few years ago).
Strainu