Pe duminică, 8 ianuarie 2023, Amir Sarabadani <ladsgroup@gmail.com> a scris:
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, privately or publicly.

I would be very surprised (and worried, mind you!) to find out that the WMF has the data needed to *reliably* link users and organizations for state-sponsored entities. The WMF is actively minimizing the amount of data it gathers on visitors and limits it to their own sites, while commercial companies are very creative in finding new ways to track their users without their consent between various media and domains.

Lacking that reliable identification, making statements related to state affiliation is almost certainly exposing the foundation to serious legal liability.

That doesn't mean that I disagree with the idea that this has been poorly communicated; nitpicking on jargon is not helping send the right message out. At the very least internal communication should explain that state "infiltration" is always a risk, regardless of country and project (remember the case on French Wikipedia a few years ago).

Strainu