I used Wikipedia as an example, I would not expect core content policy from
Wikipedia to be a good fit for Wikivoyage. Still Wikivoyage could have
common ploicies on Meta the same way Wikipedia would do.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Keegan Peterzell <keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Todd Allen
<toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'd definitely agree there. There are a few
non-negotiable points (NPOV,
copyright and licensing, nonfree content, etc.), but outside those,
individual projects generally have latitude to run things as their
community needs.
The English Wikivoyage has a "Be fair" policy, which is explicitly
different from NPOV [0]. Copyright also varies from wiki to wiki, as fair
use for non-free content on the English Wikipedia exemplifies [1].
Things are not so simple.
0.
https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Wikivoyage:Be_fair#
Neutral_point_of_view
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content
--
~Keegan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address
is in a personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>