Hi,
looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
2011/10/4 Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org:
Hi, looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt%C2%A0, it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that? Lodewijk
I think it's not worth doing it right now. We should do that just for files that are selected by the jury.
If we go ahead with the GWR thing, we can simply remove those files from the count.
Strainu
Strainu, you got me curious about GWR... what's that?
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
Strainu, you got me curious about GWR... what's that?
I guess guinness world record.
I think we should remove the template from those files.
Andre
-- Nuno Tavares Wikimedia Portugal http://www.wikimedia.pt
Imagine um mundo onde ?? dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somat??rio de todo o conhecimento humano. ?? isso o que estamos a fazer.
Participe tamb??m: http://www.wikimedia.pt
Em 04-10-2011 12:10, Strainu escreveu:
2011/10/4 Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org:
Hi, looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that? Lodewijk
I think it's not worth doing it right now. We should do that just for files that are selected by the jury.
If we go ahead with the GWR thing, we can simply remove those files from the count.
Strainu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
2011/10/4 Andre Koopal andre@molens.org:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
Strainu, you got me curious about GWR... what's that?
I guess guinness world record.
Right.
I think we should remove the template from those files.
What about Switzerland? They were also uploading in july and august.
Strainu
Bingo thats it, Switzerland had ca. 2500 pictures. so that fits. before that date it's only like 100-200. We should look for the non-switzerland cats before 1 september. Mvg, Bas
From: strainu10@gmail.com Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:58:56 +0300 To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] old uploads?
2011/10/4 Andre Koopal andre@molens.org:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
Strainu, you got me curious about GWR... what's that?
I guess guinness world record.
Right.
I think we should remove the template from those files.
What about Switzerland? They were also uploading in july and august.
Strainu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
About the pictures before 201107: Somebody added many pictures to the Swiss category from before the contest: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Hugo_Suter-Windowpicture... for example. What's this? Is the swiss contest for all pictures on commons? That seems weird. Or is this just one person not understanding the Swiss contest rules? Could you please explain, so that we can delete this 200 pictures from the contest. Mvg, Bas
From: bas_v_b@hotmail.com To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:40:03 +0200 Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] old uploads?
Bingo thats it, Switzerland had ca. 2500 pictures. so that fits. before that date it's only like 100-200. We should look for the non-switzerland cats before 1 september. Mvg, Bas
From: strainu10@gmail.com Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:58:56 +0300 To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] old uploads?
2011/10/4 Andre Koopal andre@molens.org:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
Strainu, you got me curious about GWR... what's that?
I guess guinness world record.
Right.
I think we should remove the template from those files.
What about Switzerland? They were also uploading in july and august.
Strainu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
Those are files by day the file were upload to commons? _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.*
On 4 October 2011 11:32, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi,
looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
According to the explanation in the email that contained this link, yes.
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Outubro de 2011 13:19, Béria Lima beria.lima@wikimedia.ptescreveu:
Those are files by day the file were upload to commons? _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.*
On 4 October 2011 11:32, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi,
looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
I am not sure about it, because only TgrBot uploaded more than 600 pictures on 1st of October [1]. This number is larger than 152 [2].
[1]: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&lim... [2]: http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt
Samat
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 14:40, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
According to the explanation in the email that contained this link, yes.
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Outubro de 2011 13:19, Béria Lima beria.lima@wikimedia.ptescreveu:
Those are files by day the file were upload to commons?
*Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.*
On 4 October 2011 11:32, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi,
looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
Not sure when exactly these stats have been produced, and I doubt they are being updated.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 09:30, Samat samat78@gmail.com escreveu:
I am not sure about it, because only TgrBot uploaded more than 600 pictures on 1st of October [1]. This number is larger than 152 [2].
Samat
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 14:40, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
According to the explanation in the email that contained this link, yes.
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Outubro de 2011 13:19, Béria Lima beria.lima@wikimedia.ptescreveu:
Those are files by day the file were upload to commons?
*Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.*
On 4 October 2011 11:32, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi,
looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
The 1 october stats are till 06:00 i believe or 00:06. Mvg, Bas
From: lodewijk@effeietsanders.org Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:34:27 +0200 To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] old uploads?
Not sure when exactly these stats have been produced, and I doubt they are being updated. Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 09:30, Samat samat78@gmail.com escreveu:
I am not sure about it, because only TgrBot uploaded more than 600 pictures on 1st of October [1].
This number is larger than 152 [2].
[1]: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&lim...
[2]: http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt
Samat
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 14:40, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
According to the explanation in the email that contained this link, yes. Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Outubro de 2011 13:19, Béria Lima beria.lima@wikimedia.pt escreveu:
Those are files by day the file were upload to commons?_____
Béria Lima Wikimedia Portugal
(351) 963 953 042
Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.
On 4 October 2011 11:32, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi, looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
Thats 2500-3000 pre-contest pictures, are you sure that is right? Isn't that the photograh data (exif-data?),althought that can be because I uploaded myself allready 300 pictures from one day in july. Mvg, Bas
From: lodewijk@effeietsanders.org Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:32:57 +0200 To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] old uploads?
Hi, looking at http://toolserver.org/~neilk/stats/2011-wlm-uploads-by-day.txt , it seems some people added unjustly the wlm template to many old files. Could someone check into that?
Lodewijk
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org