Hi Jean-Frédéric,
Op 13-6-2011 11:38, Jean-Frédéric schreef:
2011/6/13 Maarten Dammers <maarten(a)mdammers.nl
<mailto:maarten@mdammers.nl>>
Did anyone already try to use the Google Geocoding API [2] to get
the coordinates?
I did. I put together a proof of concept using Google Docs, see
<https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjZN8eBGaLjSdGg5WDY3OUFJRmk0NmNLRFFLSnJ6ckE&hl=en_US&authkey=CNSs97UN
<https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjZN8eBGaLjSdGg5WDY3OUFJRmk0NmNLRFFLSnJ6ckE&hl=en_US&authkey=CNSs97UN>>
This uses OSM API and GMaps API - At first look, OSM does not return
that great results, GMaps works better.
Looks cool!
I was unsure of what to do with it (whether or not it was precise
enough to mass-geoloc items)
A coordinate is better than no coordinate at all. From
that point on we
can start improving coordinates. We need of course somehow to indicate
that the coordinate is derived and might contain errors. On the other
hand: The coordinates we get from sources also contain errors so there
is no real difference. I do wonder if the error rates are about the same.
Maarten
To my understanding, Poulpy already did something
along those lines -
can you confirm ?
--
Jean-Frédéric