FYI: There will be a public event about the report next week:
Hopefully there will be an option to discuss this issues there.
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org>
it seems that the WMF evaluation department has once again put together an
evaluation of Wiki Loves Monuments. Out of curiosity, were any of the
organizers involved in this? A quick glance suggests some factual errors,
and again a big focus on assuming WLM is a consistent project, that is
similar in each country (while in reality it is a diverse collection of
projects, tailored to the needs of each country, by its community) and with
a focus towards number crunching.
Statements that begin with 'the average Wiki Loves Monuments
implementation/contest' make my eyes bleed... Did anyone make a more
thorough analysis of the report?
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list