Hello all:
I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page (http://ask.wikiedu.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:grading/p...) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing.
Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request list.
John Kleefeld Associate Professor, College of Law University of Saskatchewan 15 Campus Drive Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6
tel: (+1) 306.966.1039 email: john.kleefeld@usask.ca skype: johnkleefeld twitter: @johnkleefeld web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241.
Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill & Friel’s Damages and Compensation Culture: http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-culture-9781849467971.
Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_Assessment_for_S...
This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a starting point for your own adaptation?):
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_ A_Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf
Best regards,
Vahid.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John john.kleefeld@usask.ca wrote:
Hello all:
I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page (http://ask.wikiedu.org/ questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing.
Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request list.
John Kleefeld
Associate Professor, College of Law
University of Saskatchewan
15 Campus Drive
Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6
tel: (+1) 306.966.1039
email: john.kleefeld@usask.ca
skype: johnkleefeld
twitter: @johnkleefeld
web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241.*
Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: * http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation- culture-9781849467971.
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
Thank you Vahid for sharing with the education mailing list WMIL article assessment. We also have another grading tool:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Article_Quality_in_WMIL_...
Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information.
Kind regards, Michal
*Regards,*
*Michal Lester,*
*Executive DirectorWikimedia Israel* *http://www.wikimedia.org.il http://www.wikimedia.org.il/ * *972-50-8996046 ; 972-77-751-6032 *
2016-10-08 1:43 GMT+03:00 Vahid Masrour vmasrour@wikimedia.org:
Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_ Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf
This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a starting point for your own adaptation?):
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_A _Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf
Best regards,
Vahid.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John john.kleefeld@usask.ca wrote:
Hello all:
I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page ( http://ask.wikiedu.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity- desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing.
Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request list.
John Kleefeld
Associate Professor, College of Law
University of Saskatchewan
15 Campus Drive
Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6
tel: (+1) 306.966.1039
email: john.kleefeld@usask.ca
skype: johnkleefeld
twitter: @johnkleefeld
web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241.*
Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: * http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-cultur e-9781849467971.
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
-- Vahid Masrour Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program vmasrour@wikimedia.org https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education