On 18/02/2019 17:36, Paulo Santos Perneta wrote:
I don't believe we disagree, no, at least completely. Analysis, when
I guess you're right. I guess our argument is distorted by mixing general prinicples about proper sourcing and a particuler case that actually does not exist. It is my fault because I chose to turn an absurd rhetorical advice into a brief description of general wikipedian proceeedings "for dummies".