Birgitte SB that was the reason, why my text wasn't as polite as it should be. It sounded off-topic for me.
joergens.mi
2009/10/14 Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com
Thank you for explaining, this discussion would have been off-topic in the other thread. I am not someone that finds statistics to be a big deal, but I have learned that others feel deeply about such issues. The statistics total all pages marked "4" and report this as the number of pages a subdomain has proofread and validated. So when compared to other subdomains which mark empty pages with "0" the numbers of de.WS are slightly inflated. The current state of things is that other subdomains do not count empty pages in their totals while de.WS does. I appreciate your introducing the situation to the local community.
Birgitte SB
--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Michael Jörgens joergens.mic@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Michael Jörgens joergens.mic@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages without text To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <
wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 2:29 PM Sorry, that was my fault, I didn't read the topic right, i thougt this discussion is still part of the topic [Wikisource-l] Proofreading.
From my personal point of view, there is no difference between this pages. I see no need to distinguish empty und full pages. The final state means, all work needed is done with this page. In general I like statistiks, but never mind, I would never count empty pages. On the other hand if others like to do, no problem in general. I think we will introduce this question to our community and we will make a decision. Changes can be done by bot, as I understand.
sincerly joergens.mi 2009/10/14 Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com
I sorry you find the concerns other people have to be "empty" and "silly". Perhaps in the future you could ignore the threads on smaller issues without comment. It would really help keep things more congenial.
Birgitte SB
--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Michael Jörgens joergens.mic@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Michael Jörgens joergens.mic@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages
without text
To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free
library" wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 12:15 PM
Is there a need for
this
''empty discussion'' about empty
pages
here,
The main point ist to find an for all acceptable
way of working together with Thomas. In a way
that Thomas is satisfied and feels comfortable,
taking the
problems he see's into concern and the problems
some
projects have.
And it should be a compromise that all can accept,
without feeling overruled by others.
With this in the background the other discussion
is simply silly. Some are talking about some pages,
which
in total are below 1%, there are bigger issues to
solve.
sincerly joergens.mi
2009/10/14 Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com
I
disagree in general with the idea that everyone must
conform. There is room for the communities to
develop
their own solutions. Hopefully when one community
proves
that some solution has good results others will learn
from
their experience and adopt it. But there needs to be
room
for experimentation.
In this specific case, it seems to me this is more of
legacy issue on de.WS rather than a deliberate choice.
If
they (as well as every other subdomains) conform to
the
standards the majority of Wikisources use then the
comparative numbers between Wikisources will be more
accurate. I don't see a strong reason for de.WS
deciding to not conform here. But it is a bunch of
tedious
work and it should be thoroughly discussed. It would
be
very nice if de.WS took the time to consider the issue
and
let us know what the consensus turns out to be.
However we can always make a footnote when people
choose to
count things differently and estimate with data
crunching.
(i.e. Of 1000 validated pages on the top three
non-de.WS
subdomains the average number of empty pages is X
(A%),
therefore an estimate of de.WS validated non-empty
page is
the given total minus the A% of the given total)
This is
not an unsolvable issue and I am sure sooner of later
some
subdomain will discover a good reason to do something
differently.
Birgitte SB
--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Syagrius syagrius@gmx.fr
wrote:
From: Syagrius syagrius@gmx.fr
Subject: Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages without text
To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the
free
library" wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:47 AM
#yiv579852079 html, #yiv579852079
{}#yiv579852079 html
{width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv579852079
{font-size:100.01%;font-family:Verdana, Geneva,
Arial,
Helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:transparent;background-image:none;margin:0px;padding:5px;}#yiv579852079
p {margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv579852079
{font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana, Geneva,
Arial,
Helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:#FFFFFF;}#yiv579852079 p
{margin:0;padding:0;}#yiv579852079 blockquote
{padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:0px;}#yiv579852079
blockquote.quote {border-left:1px solid
#CCC;padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;} If the
Wikisources have adopted
some common rules, every sublanguage
should follow it. On
the other hand, I don't understand why you
don't
want to transform these empty pages, since en.ws
and fr.ws
already did it and a bot could do it very
easily.
There
would be absolutely no loss of quality or
credibility...
Syagrius
----- Message
d'origine -----De : John
VandenbergEnvoyés : 14.10.09 02:03À :
discussion list for Wikisource, the
free
libraryObjet : Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages without
text On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:12
AM, Cecil
wrote:
Syagrius, could you please explain why this
would
be
"irrespectuous toward
other wikisources" when we mark them as
part
of a
'finished' project?
It is not a part of the same work.
Advertisements are a _different_ work, and it has
not
been
transcribed.
It should be marked as a incomplete.
Advertisements are also sources....
:-)
--
John Vandenberg
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l