It's now over a month since the appended exchange, when I suggested that the answer "All change has negative connotations to some members of the community", to the question "Could this Recommendation [to, in part, allow material with NC and ND licences] have a negative impact/change?" be rewritten to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant risks.
I've just checked, and it's unchanged.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 17:52, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 16:51, Nicole Ebber nicole.ebber@wikimedia.de wrote:
This is a process for all of us to shape our shared future, together; let’s keep engaging and challenging one another in this same spirit.
Perhaps it would also be in keeping with that spirit for this:
Q4a. Could this Recommendation have a negative impact/change? All change has negative connotations to some members of the communityto be re-written, to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant risks?
As it stands, I do not find it to be "solution-oriented", nor indicative of "due review and reflection", nor "in the spirit of collegial collaboration", and I do not think anyone could plausibly argue that it is any of those things.