It's now over a month since the appended exchange, when I suggested
that the answer "All change has negative connotations to some members
of the community", to the question "Could this Recommendation [to, in
part, allow material with NC and ND licences] have a negative
impact/change?" be rewritten to actually reflect the proposal's real
and significant risks.
I've just checked, and it's unchanged.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 17:52, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 16:51, Nicole Ebber <nicole.ebber(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
This is a
process for all of us to shape our shared future, together; let’s keep
engaging and challenging one another in this same spirit.
Perhaps it would also be in keeping with that spirit for this:
Q4a. Could this Recommendation have a negative impact/change?
All change has negative connotations to some members of the community
to be re-written, to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant risks?
As it stands, I do not find it to be "solution-oriented", nor
indicative of "due review and reflection", nor "in the spirit of
collegial collaboration", and I do not think anyone could plausibly
argue that it is any of those things.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk