That's the reason why the idea of "reciprocating" via Wikipedia is always wrong.
Vito
Il giorno gio 3 ott 2019 alle ore 11:27 Antoine Musso hashar+wmf@free.fr ha scritto:
On 01/10/2019 17:46, Samuel Klein wrote:
From a Harvard biology list, via my friend Chris: a newly named species
of
Viola https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Viola_wikipedia! /SJ
====== Forwarded message =======
Many of you may use Wikipedia.
Here is a plant name (*Viola Wikipedia*), which may be first name to
honor
Wikipedia.
Viola wikipedia J.M.Watson & A.R.Flores, Int. Rock Gard. 117: 47. 2019
<snip> Hello,
According to the international plant names index [0], the name is illegitimate [1] and the plant actual name is "Viola angustifolia". We should probably have the created articles to be renamed toward the legitimate name instead :]
It is still a great token of appreciation, and I am quite happy to see Wikipedia being of good use for plant research!
[0] https://www.ipni.org/n/77202100-1 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomen_illegitimum
-- Antoine "hashar" Musso
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe