That's the reason why the idea of "reciprocating" via Wikipedia is always
wrong.
Vito
Il giorno gio 3 ott 2019 alle ore 11:27 Antoine Musso <hashar+wmf(a)free.fr>
ha scritto:
On 01/10/2019 17:46, Samuel Klein wrote:
From a Harvard biology list, via my friend
Chris: a newly named species
of
Viola
<https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Viola_wikipedia>!
/SJ
====== Forwarded message =======
Many of you may use Wikipedia.
Here is a plant name (*Viola Wikipedia*), which may be first name to
honor
Wikipedia.
Viola wikipedia J.M.Watson & A.R.Flores, Int. Rock Gard. 117: 47. 2019
<snip>
Hello,
According to the international plant names index [0], the name is
illegitimate [1] and the plant actual name is "Viola angustifolia". We
should probably have the created articles to be renamed toward the
legitimate name instead :]
It is still a great token of appreciation, and I am quite happy to see
Wikipedia being of good use for plant research!
[0]
https://www.ipni.org/n/77202100-1
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomen_illegitimum
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>