To be clear I did only suggest to list a number for the activities the fdc
gives a comment. I e. Fill out the first column and put a not applicable in
the recommended money column.
On May 17, 2017 04:25, "Pine W" <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For what it's worth, there has been previous
discussions of having external
reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar institution.
I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing
hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial expenditures.
Pine
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER
<rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding
for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides
feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>