Dear Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a year to make recommendations about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. This is now the 9th round of allocations made by the FDC, and we met in person from May 12-14, 2017 in Warsaw to deliberate on 4 proposals submitted this round, as well as to provide feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation draft Annual Plan. We would like to thank all of the participating organizations for the hard work they put into this round’s proposals.
Our recommendations for Round 2 2016-2017 on the annual plan grants to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta.[1] The Board will review our deliberations and make a decision by July 1, 2017.
We received grant requests for approximately USD 1,430,000 this round. Before we met, committee members reviewed all of the proposals and documents submitted. We were assisted in this review with input from the FDC staff assessments which included analysis on impact, finances, and programs, as well as community comments on the proposals.
As you may know, there is a formal process to submit complaints or appeals about these recommendations. Here are the steps for both:
Any organization that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s Round 1 recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to the FDC by 23:59 UTC on 8 June 2017 in accord with the appeal process outlined in the FDC Framework [2]. A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be in the form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two non-voting WMF Board representatives to the FDC, Dariusz Jemielniak and Christophe Henner. The appeal should be submitted on-wiki, and must be submitted by the Board Chair of a funding-seeking applicant. The Wikimedia Foundation Board will publish its decision on this and all recommendations by July 1, 2017.
Anyone can file a complaint about the FDC process [3] with the Ombudsperson at any time. The complaint should be submitted on wiki, as well. The Ombudsperson will publicly document the complaint, and investigate as needed.
On behalf of the FDC,
Anne Clin / Risker
FDC Chair
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_recommendations/2016-2017_rou...
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_ recommendations_of_the_FDC
[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Complaints_ about_the_FDC_process
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
On May 15, 2017 12:21 PM, "Risker" risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a year to make recommendations about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. This is now the 9th round of allocations made by the FDC, and we met in person from May 12-14, 2017 in Warsaw to deliberate on 4 proposals submitted this round, as well as to provide feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation draft Annual Plan. We would like to thank all of the participating organizations for the hard work they put into this round’s proposals.
Our recommendations for Round 2 2016-2017 on the annual plan grants to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta.[1] The Board will review our deliberations and make a decision by July 1, 2017.
We received grant requests for approximately USD 1,430,000 this round. Before we met, committee members reviewed all of the proposals and documents submitted. We were assisted in this review with input from the FDC staff assessments which included analysis on impact, finances, and programs, as well as community comments on the proposals.
As you may know, there is a formal process to submit complaints or appeals about these recommendations. Here are the steps for both:
Any organization that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s Round 1 recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to the FDC by 23:59 UTC on 8 June 2017 in accord with the appeal process outlined in the FDC Framework [2]. A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be in the form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two non-voting WMF Board representatives to the FDC, Dariusz Jemielniak and Christophe Henner. The appeal should be submitted on-wiki, and must be submitted by the Board Chair of a funding-seeking applicant. The Wikimedia Foundation Board will publish its decision on this and all recommendations by July 1, 2017.
Anyone can file a complaint about the FDC process [3] with the Ombudsperson at any time. The complaint should be submitted on wiki, as well. The Ombudsperson will publicly document the complaint, and investigate as needed.
On behalf of the FDC,
Anne Clin / Risker
FDC Chair
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_recommendations/2016-2017_ round_2
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Appeals_to_ the_Board_on_the_ recommendations_of_the_FDC
[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Complaints_ about_the_FDC_process _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne
For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having external reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar institution. I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial expenditures.
Pine
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
To be clear I did only suggest to list a number for the activities the fdc gives a comment. I e. Fill out the first column and put a not applicable in the recommended money column.
On May 17, 2017 04:25, "Pine W" wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having external reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar institution. I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial expenditures.
Pine
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com
wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking that you were referring to both the request column and the recommendation column.
Perhaps WMF, affiliate, and community finances will be discussed as a part of the strategy process, probably not so much during the goal-setting phase but more during the follow-up when I hope that SMART goals will be designated and the questions of "how do we get there from here?" will be addressed.
Pine
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:21 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com wrote:
To be clear I did only suggest to list a number for the activities the fdc gives a comment. I e. Fill out the first column and put a not applicable in the recommended money column.
On May 17, 2017 04:25, "Pine W" wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having
external
reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar
institution.
I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial
expenditures.
Pine
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com
wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending
funding
for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org